Research phase · F118

F118 — Talk Manual Regression

F118 covers “Talk Manual Regression”. The canonical record classifies it as validated, based on 2 source artifacts and 1 original source figure. The highlighted measurements are Summary Readable Rate = 100, Summary Sensible Rate = 93.333, and Summary Expected Rate = 93.333.

F118 Validated PASS

StatusValidated

VerdictPASS

Source figures1

Artifacts2

Purpose and research question

The objective is to document the recorded outcome for “Talk Manual Regression”. The research question is whether the phase-specific checks support the canonical validated classification. The recorded measurements include Summary Readable Rate = 100, Summary Sensible Rate = 93.333, and Summary Expected Rate = 93.333.

Method

F118 is documented by 1 structured JSON record and 1 Markdown report and 1 original source figure. The reported table retains safe scalar measurements found in that phase package.

Documentation basis

2 source artifacts and 1 phase-specific figure are recorded for this phase.

Evidence highlights

Summary Readable Rate: 100
Summary Sensible Rate: 93.333
Summary Expected Rate: 93.333
Summary Ambiguity Rate: 90
Summary Pseudo Word Ratio: 0
Summary Avg Latency Ms: 108.158
Summary P95 Latency Ms: 78.052
Summary Ambiguity Total: 10

Recorded evidence

Summary Readable Rate	100
Summary Sensible Rate	93.333
Summary Expected Rate	93.333
Summary Ambiguity Rate	90
Summary Pseudo Word Ratio	0
Summary Avg Latency Ms	108.158
Summary P95 Latency Ms	78.052
Summary Ambiguity Total	10

Public evidence and source figures

F118 benchmark evidence — Talk Manual Regression 118 — **Talk Manual Regression 118**
Original source figure · 2025 × 1020 px

These are original source figures from the existing public evidence set, not editorial HTML visualizations.

Result and interpretation

F118 Talk Manual Regression PASS

F118 is classified as validated with the recorded decision PASS. The recorded measurements include Summary Readable Rate = 100, Summary Sensible Rate = 93.333, Summary Expected Rate = 93.333, and Summary Ambiguity Rate = 90.

Key results

Summary Readable Rate: 100
Summary Sensible Rate: 93.333
Summary Expected Rate: 93.333
Summary Ambiguity Rate: 90
Summary Pseudo Word Ratio: 0
Summary Avg Latency Ms: 108.158
Summary P95 Latency Ms: 78.052
Summary Ambiguity Total: 10

Evidence sources

Values on this page are reproduced from the archived phase record and the source artifacts below. No new benchmark was run to create this page.

TALK MANUAL REGRESSION 118 (JSON)
TALK MANUAL REGRESSION 118 (MD)

Research topics

Word / World Document · Speech · Memory · Training