Research phase · F108

F108 — Hierarchical Memory Routing

F108 covers “Hierarchical Memory Routing”. The canonical record classifies it as validated, based on 2 source artifacts and 1 original source figure. The highlighted measurements are Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count = 120, Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count = 120, and Summary Flat Recall At 10 = 100.

F108 Validated PASS

StatusValidated

VerdictPASS

Source figures1

Artifacts2

Purpose and research question

The objective is to document the recorded outcome for “Hierarchical Memory Routing”. The research question is whether the phase-specific checks support the canonical validated classification. The recorded measurements include Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count = 120, Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count = 120, and Summary Flat Recall At 10 = 100.

Method

F108 is documented by 1 structured JSON record and 1 Markdown report and 1 original source figure. The reported table retains safe scalar measurements found in that phase package.

Documentation basis

2 source artifacts and 1 phase-specific figure are recorded for this phase.

Evidence highlights

Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count: 120
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count: 120
Summary Flat Recall At 10: 100
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10: 100
Summary Recall Drop: 0
Summary Checkpoint Touched: No
Summary Training Started: No
Summary Status: PASS

Recorded evidence

Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count	120
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count	120
Summary Flat Recall At 10	100
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10	100
Summary Recall Drop	0
Summary Checkpoint Touched	No
Summary Training Started	No
Summary Status	PASS

Public evidence and source figures

F108 benchmark evidence — Hierarchical Memory Routing 108 — **Hierarchical Memory Routing 108**
Original source figure · 1950 × 1020 px

These are original source figures from the existing public evidence set, not editorial HTML visualizations.

Result and interpretation

F108 Hierarchical Memory Routing PASS

F108 is classified as validated with the recorded decision PASS. The recorded measurements include Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count = 120, Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count = 120, Summary Flat Recall At 10 = 100, and Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 = 100.

Key results

Summary Flat Recall At 10 Count: 120
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10 Count: 120
Summary Flat Recall At 10: 100
Summary Hierarchical Recall At 10: 100
Summary Recall Drop: 0
Summary Checkpoint Touched: No
Summary Training Started: No
Summary Status: PASS

Evidence sources

Values on this page are reproduced from the archived phase record and the source artifacts below. No new benchmark was run to create this page.

HIERARCHICAL MEMORY ROUTING 108 (JSON)
HIERARCHICAL MEMORY ROUTING 108 (MD)

Research topics

Word Memory · Word / World Document · Memory · Training